Restore or Rewild: The Future of Avalon & Blydenburgh

Balancing History & Nature

The Debate Over Long Island Ponds

In the wake of the “Thousand Year Storm” that swept through our region this past weekend, the landscape of two beloved Long Island parks—Avalon Preserve in Stony Brook and Blydenburgh Park in Smithtown—has been forever altered. The catastrophic failure of the dams at Duck Pond and Stump Pond has left these iconic water features empty, their once-serene waters drained away, leaving behind a stark and desolate landscape. For many who have walked these park trails, cast a fishing line into the ponds, or simply enjoyed the quiet reflection these bodies of water offered, the loss feels deeply personal, as though a piece of our community’s history has vanished overnight.

Yet, as often happens in the aftermath of such events, a heated debate has arisen over what should come next. On one side are those who argue that these ponds, which were man-made, should be fully restored to their former glory, preserving the historical and recreational value they’ve provided for decades. To them, these ponds are more than just water and earth—they are a living connection to the past, a testament to the human effort that shaped our local landscape.

On the other side are those who see this as a rare opportunity to allow nature to take its course, and to return the landscape to a more natural state that might have existed before human intervention. They argue that this is a chance to embrace rewilding, to allow the land to heal and regenerate in a way that is more sustainable and better suited to the ecological challenges of the future.

Both sides have valid points. The ponds at Avalon and Blydenburgh have played a significant role in our local history and community life, and their absence is keenly felt. Yet, the idea of rewilding—of allowing the land to return to its natural state—offers a vision of a future where humans and nature coexist in a more harmonious balance. As we navigate this emotional and complex discussion, it’s essential to consider not only what we’ve lost but also what we stand to gain by exploring new possibilities.

In this article, we’ll delve into the history of these parks and their ponds, examine the challenges and potential environmental impacts of restoration, and explore the benefits and risks of rewilding. We’ll also discuss how sustainable practices like permaculture could offer a way forward, blending the best of both worlds to create a landscape that honors the past while embracing a more ecologically sound future. By taking a balanced approach, we hope to encourage a thoughtful and respectful conversation about the future of Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park—one that considers the needs of our community, the health of our environment, and the legacy we leave for future generations.

Historical Significance of Avalon Preserve & Blydenburgh Park

The Mill Pond at Avalon Preserve and the Stump Pond at Blydenburgh Park have been cherished landmarks on Long Island for generations, each with its own unique history and cultural significance. These ponds, though man-made, have become integral parts of the natural landscape, offering both recreational opportunities and a connection to the past for countless visitors.

The History of Avalon Preserve’s Mill Pond

The Mill Pond at Avalon Preserve, located in Stony Brook, has long been a tranquil spot where residents and visitors alike could find a moment of peace amidst the hustle and bustle of modern life. Originally created as a millpond in the 18th century, it served as a crucial component of the local economy, powering mills that processed grain and other goods essential to the community’s survival. Over time, as the need for water-powered mills diminished, the Mill Pond transitioned from a functional body of water to a beloved recreational feature within Avalon Preserve.

For many years, the Mill Pond has been a haven for birdwatchers, anglers, and those simply seeking solace in nature. The pond’s still waters and surrounding greenery have provided a picturesque backdrop for countless walks, picnics, and community events. Its historical roots, coupled with its role as a recreational site, have made the Mill Pond a symbol of continuity—a link between the past and the present, where the legacy of early Long Island settlers can still be felt.

The History of Blydenburgh Park’s Stump Pond

Stump Pond, also known as New Mill Pond, is located in Blydenburgh Park in Smithtown and holds a similar significance for its community. The pond was formed in the early 19th century when a dam was constructed on the Nissequogue River to power a sawmill, which was instrumental in supporting the local timber industry. The pond’s name, “Stump Pond,” is derived from the tree stumps that were left standing in the water after the area was flooded—an enduring reminder of the land’s transformation from forest to industrial site.

Over the years, Stump Pond has evolved from its industrial origins into a popular destination for outdoor enthusiasts. Its expansive waters have made it a favorite spot for kayaking, canoeing, and fishing, while the surrounding parkland offers miles of trails for hiking and horseback riding. The pond’s history as a man-made feature, coupled with its natural beauty, has endeared it to generations of Long Islanders who see it as a vital part of the community’s heritage.

The Case for Restoration

For many, the idea of restoring the Mill Pond and Stump Pond to their former states is about more than just rebuilding the dams—it’s about preserving the history and identity of these parks. The ponds are seen as living monuments to the ingenuity and hard work of the early settlers who shaped the landscape to meet their needs. Restoring these ponds would honor that legacy, ensuring that future generations can continue to experience and appreciate the historical significance of these sites.

Furthermore, the ponds have become deeply embedded in the cultural fabric of the surrounding communities. They serve as gathering places for residents, offering spaces for relaxation, recreation, and connection with nature. The loss of these ponds is felt not just as an environmental issue but as a cultural one, raising concerns about what it would mean for the community if they were not restored.

As the debate continues over whether to restore the ponds or allow the landscape to revert to its natural state, the historical significance of Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park plays a crucial role in the discussion. The decision to restore or rewild these ponds is not just about water management or ecological health—it’s also about how we choose to honor and preserve our shared history. As we look to the future, it’s essential to consider how these parks have shaped our past and how they can continue to serve as vital cultural and natural resources for generations to come.

Challenges of Restoration

The call to restore the Mill Pond at Avalon Preserve and Stump Pond at Blydenburgh Park is strong, especially from those who cherish the historical and recreational significance of these bodies of water. However, the path to restoration is fraught with challenges—challenges that are not only technical and financial but also environmental. Understanding these complexities is essential to making an informed decision about the future of these beloved ponds.

The Complexity of Dam Repair

One of the most significant hurdles in restoring the ponds is the sheer complexity of repairing the dams that once held back their waters. These dams, many decades old, were not designed to withstand the kind of extreme weather events we’re increasingly seeing today. The “Thousand Year Storm” that caused the catastrophic failures was a stark reminder of the limitations of man-made structures in the face of nature’s power.

Repairing these dams would require extensive engineering work, likely involving the complete reconstruction of the dam walls, spillways, and other infrastructure. This isn’t a simple patch job—it’s a major construction project that could take years to plan and execute. Engineers would need to assess the current state of the dams, determine the best materials and designs for modern-day conditions, and ensure that the new structures meet rigorous safety standards to withstand future storms.

Regulatory and Funding Challenges

Beyond the technical aspects, there are significant regulatory hurdles to clear before restoration can even begin. Both Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park are part of protected parklands, which means that any significant construction or restoration work would require permits and approvals from multiple governmental and environmental agencies. These approvals are designed to ensure that any work done is safe, environmentally sound, and in the public interest—but they can also add layers of complexity and delay to the project.

Securing funding for the restoration is another challenge. Repairing or rebuilding the dams and restoring the ponds to their former state would be costly, potentially running into the millions of dollars. Public funds for such projects are often limited, especially in the face of competing priorities like infrastructure repair, public health, and education. Securing these funds could require a combination of local, state, and federal grants, as well as private donations or fundraising efforts—a process that could take years to complete.

Environmental Considerations

While the cultural and recreational value of the ponds is clear, restoring them could also have unintended environmental consequences that need to be carefully considered. The sudden draining of the ponds has already disrupted the local ecosystems, affecting the flora and fauna that had adapted to the man-made environment. Restoring the ponds would involve re-flooding these areas, which could further disrupt the delicate balance of the local ecology.

For example, the construction work required to rebuild the dams could lead to soil erosion, sediment runoff, and other forms of environmental degradation. Additionally, the process of reintroducing water to the ponds could impact the water quality of nearby streams and rivers, potentially leading to issues like algae blooms or the spread of invasive species.

Restoration efforts would also need to consider the long-term sustainability of the ponds. With climate change increasing the frequency and intensity of storms, there’s a real risk that even newly rebuilt dams could fail again in the future. Any restoration plan would need to incorporate modern design techniques that take into account these changing environmental conditions, ensuring that the ponds can be sustained for generations to come.

Balancing the Desire for Restoration with Practical Realities

The desire to restore the Mill Pond and Stump Pond is understandable. These ponds have been central to the identity of Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park, providing places of beauty, recreation, and connection to history. But restoration is not a decision that can be made lightly. The challenges—technical, regulatory, financial, and environmental—are significant and must be carefully weighed against the benefits.

It’s important to recognize that while restoration offers the chance to preserve a cherished part of our past, it also requires a commitment to overcoming these challenges. The decision to restore the ponds must be based on a clear understanding of the complexities involved, as well as a realistic assessment of what can be achieved within the constraints of time, budget, and environmental stewardship.

As we move forward, it’s essential to engage in an open, honest discussion about what restoration would entail and whether it’s the best path forward for Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park. By considering the challenges alongside the potential benefits, we can make a decision that honors both our history and our responsibility to the environment and future generations.

Environmental Impacts of Dam Failures

The sudden and catastrophic failure of the dams at Mill Pond in Avalon Preserve and Stump Pond in Blydenburgh Park has not only altered the physical landscape but has also triggered a cascade of environmental consequences that will be felt for years to come. These impacts extend far beyond the immediate areas where the ponds once stood, influencing local ecosystems, water quality, and even the broader ecological health of the surrounding regions. As we consider the future of these sites, it’s crucial to understand the full scope of these environmental effects.

Immediate Impacts on Local Flora & Fauna

The most visible and immediate impact of the dam failures has been the complete draining of the ponds, leaving behind barren, muddy basins where thriving aquatic ecosystems once existed. The sudden loss of water has had a devastating effect on the flora and fauna that depended on these ponds for survival. Fish, amphibians, and other aquatic creatures that called these ponds home were abruptly left without a habitat, leading to mass die-offs and the disruption of the local food chain.

Birds, too, have been affected. Both Mill Pond and Stump Pond were critical stopover points for migratory waterfowl and a haven for resident bird species. Without the ponds, these birds have lost vital feeding and nesting grounds, forcing them to relocate or face reduced survival rates. The loss of these habitats could have ripple effects across the entire local ecosystem, as species that relied on the ponds either adapt, migrate, or perish.

The surrounding vegetation has also been impacted. The aquatic plants that thrived in the shallow waters of the ponds are now exposed to the air, leading to their desiccation and death. This loss of plant life not only affects the animals that relied on it for food and shelter but also destabilizes the soil, increasing the risk of erosion and further ecological degradation.

Long-Term Effects on Ecosystems

While the immediate impacts are stark, the long-term effects of the dam failures could be even more profound. The sudden drying of the ponds will likely lead to significant changes in the local water table, potentially affecting groundwater levels and the availability of water for nearby plants and animals. This could result in shifts in the types of vegetation that can thrive in the area, potentially leading to the spread of invasive species that are better adapted to the new conditions.

Moreover, the loss of these ponds could alter the hydrology of the surrounding region. The ponds acted as natural reservoirs, helping to regulate water flow and reduce the risk of flooding downstream. Without these bodies of water, the area may become more susceptible to both flooding during heavy rains and drought during dry spells, further stressing the local environment.

The dam failures have also disrupted the natural filtration processes that the ponds provided. As water flowed into the ponds, sediments and pollutants would settle to the bottom, improving the quality of the water that eventually flowed out. Without the ponds, these sediments and pollutants are more likely to be carried downstream, potentially leading to deteriorating water quality in nearby rivers, streams, and wetlands. This could harm aquatic life, reduce biodiversity, and make the water less safe for human use.

The Spread of Invasive Species

One of the less obvious but potentially most damaging consequences of the dam failures is the increased risk of invasive species spreading into the newly exposed areas. Invasive plants and animals often thrive in disturbed environments, where they can outcompete native species and disrupt the balance of the ecosystem. The sudden exposure of the pond beds creates a prime environment for invasives to take root.

Plants like phragmites (common reed) and Japanese knotweed, which are already a problem in many parts of Long Island, could quickly colonize the empty basins, crowding out native vegetation and making it even more difficult for the area to recover naturally. These invasive species are not only difficult to remove once established, but they also provide little value to local wildlife, further reducing the biodiversity of the area.

Impacts on Water Quality & Downstream Ecosystems

The disruption of the ponds has the potential to negatively impact water quality, both in the immediate area and downstream. The ponds previously acted as a buffer, slowing down the flow of water and allowing sediments and pollutants to settle out before the water continued its journey through the landscape. Without this natural filtration system, these sediments and pollutants may be carried directly into downstream rivers and wetlands, where they can harm aquatic life and degrade the overall health of the ecosystem.

The potential for increased sedimentation downstream is particularly concerning. Sediments can smother aquatic habitats, clog the gills of fish, and reduce the clarity of the water, making it difficult for aquatic plants to photosynthesize. In extreme cases, this can lead to “dead zones” where little to no aquatic life can survive. Pollutants, such as agricultural runoff, road salts, and chemicals, may also become more concentrated in the absence of the ponds’ filtration, leading to further environmental degradation.

The Balance of Nature: A Call for Thoughtful Action

The environmental impacts of the dam failures at Mill Pond and Stump Pond are far-reaching and complex, touching on nearly every aspect of the local ecosystem. While the ponds were man-made, they had become integral parts of the natural landscape, providing essential services to both wildlife and the surrounding environment. Their loss presents a significant challenge—but also an opportunity to rethink how we interact with and manage these natural spaces.

As the community debates whether to restore the ponds or allow the landscape to return to a more natural state, it’s crucial to keep these environmental considerations at the forefront of the conversation. Any decision made will have long-lasting consequences for the local ecosystem, and it’s important to approach this challenge with a clear understanding of the potential impacts—both positive and negative.

In the sections that follow, we will explore the debate between restoration and rewilding, weigh the pros and cons of each approach, and consider how sustainable practices like permaculture might offer a balanced solution that respects both the history and the ecology of Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park. By taking a thoughtful and informed approach, we can work toward a future that honors our past while protecting the natural world for generations to come.

The Debate – Restore vs. Rewild

The devastation caused by the “Thousand Year Storm” has left the future of Mill Pond at Avalon Preserve and Stump Pond at Blydenburgh Park hanging in the balance. With the ponds now dry and their once-thriving ecosystems disrupted, the community is faced with a critical decision: should these beloved water features be restored to their former state, or should the landscape be allowed to revert to a more natural, pre-human intervention state through rewilding? This debate is both deeply emotional and complex, with valid arguments on both sides that reflect different values, priorities, and visions for the future.

Preserving History & Community Identity: The Case for Restoration

For many, the idea of restoring Mill Pond and Stump Pond is about more than just fixing a physical landscape—it’s about preserving a sense of history, identity, and continuity that these ponds represent. The ponds have been central to the life of their respective parks for generations, serving as places of recreation, reflection, and community gathering. Their still waters and surrounding greenery have been a source of beauty, peace, and connection to the past.

Pros of Restoration:

• Historical Significance: Restoring the ponds would preserve their historical and cultural significance, maintaining a living link to the past. The ponds are reminders of the ingenuity and hard work of those who came before us, who shaped the landscape to serve the needs of their communities. Restoring them would honor that legacy, ensuring that future generations can continue to experience and appreciate these historical landmarks.
• Recreational Value: The ponds have long been cherished recreational spaces, offering opportunities for fishing, birdwatching, kayaking, and simply enjoying nature. Restoring them would allow these activities to continue, providing a space for families and individuals to connect with the outdoors in a familiar and beloved setting.
• Stability for Local Ecosystems: While the ponds are man-made, they have become integrated into the local ecosystem over time. Restoring them could help stabilize the environment by reintroducing aquatic habitats and supporting the species that have adapted to life in and around the ponds.

Cons of Restoration:

• Environmental and Financial Costs: Restoration would require significant financial investment and engineering work, including rebuilding the dams, dredging the pond basins, and potentially replanting aquatic vegetation. This process could be expensive, time-consuming, and disruptive to the surrounding environment, potentially causing further ecological harm.
• Risk of Future Failures: Even with modern engineering techniques, there is no guarantee that newly restored dams would be able to withstand future extreme weather events, especially as climate change continues to increase the frequency and intensity of storms. This raises the question of whether restoration is a sustainable long-term solution.
• Missed Opportunity for Rewilding: By focusing on restoration, the community might miss an opportunity to explore more sustainable and ecologically beneficial approaches to land management, such as rewilding, which could offer a more resilient and adaptable landscape.

The Case for Rewilding: Embracing Nature’s Resilience

On the other side of the debate are those who see the dam failures as an opportunity to allow nature to reclaim the landscape, returning it to a more natural state that might have existed before human intervention. Rewilding is the process of restoring an area to its natural, uncultivated state, allowing ecosystems to regenerate and evolve without human interference. Proponents of rewilding argue that this approach could lead to a more sustainable and ecologically balanced environment, better suited to the challenges of the future.

Pros of Rewilding:

• Ecological Restoration: Rewilding would allow the land to recover and regenerate naturally, potentially leading to increased biodiversity and the return of native species that have been displaced by human activities. This process could create a more resilient ecosystem, better able to withstand environmental changes and extreme weather events.
• Sustainability: By allowing nature to take its course, rewilding would require less ongoing maintenance and human intervention, reducing the long-term financial and environmental costs associated with managing the ponds. A rewilded landscape could be largely self-sustaining, with natural processes like water filtration, soil stabilization, and plant growth occurring without the need for artificial structures or inputs.
• Climate Adaptation: Rewilding could help the landscape adapt to the realities of climate change by promoting natural water management processes, such as the re-establishment of wetlands, which can absorb excess rainfall and mitigate the effects of flooding. This approach could create a more flexible and adaptable landscape that is better equipped to handle future environmental challenges.

Cons of Rewilding:

• Loss of Cultural and Recreational Assets: Rewilding would mean the permanent loss of the ponds as they are currently known, along with the recreational opportunities they provide. For those who have a deep emotional connection to these water features, this could be seen as a loss of cultural heritage and a diminishment of the parks’ appeal to visitors.
• Potential for Unintended Ecological Consequences: While rewilding aims to restore natural ecosystems, there is always a risk that the process could lead to unintended consequences, such as the spread of invasive species, changes in water availability, or the loss of certain habitats. Without careful management, rewilding could disrupt the balance of the local environment in ways that are difficult to predict or control.
• Community Resistance: Rewilding represents a significant shift in how the parks are managed and perceived. Some community members may be resistant to this change, preferring the familiar landscape of the ponds to the uncertainty of a rewilded environment. This resistance could create challenges in gaining public support and consensus for the rewilding effort.

The Middle Ground: Balancing Restoration & Rewilding

As the debate continues, it’s important to consider whether a middle ground can be found—one that incorporates elements of both restoration and rewilding to create a balanced and sustainable future for Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park. This approach could involve restoring some aspects of the ponds while allowing other areas to revert to their natural state, creating a mosaic of habitats that support both human recreation and ecological health.

One possibility is to restore the dams and reintroduce water to the ponds, but with modifications that enhance their ecological function. For example, the ponds could be partially rewilded with native wetland plants that provide habitat for wildlife while also stabilizing the soil and filtering water. This hybrid approach could offer the best of both worlds: preserving the historical and recreational value of the ponds while also promoting sustainability and resilience.

Another option is to rewild the ponds entirely, but with the addition of carefully designed human access points, such as boardwalks or observation areas, that allow visitors to enjoy the beauty of the rewilded landscape without disturbing its natural processes. This approach would honor the principle of rewilding while still providing opportunities for people to connect with nature in a meaningful and low-impact way.

A Community Decision: Weighing the Pros & Cons

The future of Mill Pond and Stump Pond is ultimately a decision that will be made by the community—a decision that will reflect the values, priorities, and hopes of those who care about these parks. Both restoration and rewilding offer compelling visions for the future, each with its own set of benefits and challenges. As the debate continues, it’s essential to engage in a thoughtful and respectful conversation that considers the full range of possibilities.

In the next section, we will explore the risks of human encroachment on the newly exposed land and discuss how sustainable practices like permaculture could help bridge the gap between restoration and rewilding, creating a landscape that is both ecologically sound and welcoming to people. By finding common ground and working together, we can create a future for Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park that honors both our past and our commitment to the natural world.

The Risks of Human Encroachment on Newly Available Land

As the debate over the future of Mill Pond and Stump Pond unfolds, another critical concern comes into focus: the risk of human encroachment on the newly exposed land. With the ponds now empty, what was once submerged beneath tranquil waters has become accessible land, ripe for potential development or other human activities. This sudden availability of land presents both an opportunity and a danger—one that requires careful consideration to prevent further environmental degradation and to protect the integrity of these cherished parks.

Human Opportunism: The Dark Side of Newly Available Land

Throughout history, whenever land becomes available—whether through natural events like this or human activities such as deforestation or urban expansion—there is often a rush to capitalize on it. This can take many forms: real estate development, commercial enterprises, or even seemingly benign recreational activities that, over time, can cause significant harm to the environment.

In the case of Mill Pond and Stump Pond, the sudden exposure of the lakebeds could attract interest from those who see the newly available land as a resource to be exploited. Without careful planning and regulation, there is a risk that these areas could be repurposed for activities that prioritize short-term gain over long-term ecological health. For example, the land could be developed into parking lots, recreational facilities, or even new housing—transformations that would permanently alter the landscape and eliminate any possibility of returning it to a natural or semi-natural state.

Such developments would not only disrupt the local environment but also detract from the parks’ natural beauty and their value as spaces for community recreation and reflection. The conversion of these areas into human-dominated landscapes would likely involve the removal of any remaining natural features, further contributing to the loss of habitat for wildlife and the degradation of the local ecosystem.

Invasive Species: An Unseen Threat

Another significant risk associated with the newly exposed land is the potential for invasive species to take hold. Invasive species are non-native plants and animals that, when introduced to a new environment, can spread rapidly and outcompete native species. They often thrive in disturbed areas—such as the exposed lakebeds—where the natural balance of the ecosystem has been disrupted.

The bare, nutrient-rich soil of the lakebeds provides an ideal environment for invasive plants like phragmites (common reed), Japanese knotweed, and purple loosestrife to establish themselves. Once these plants take root, they can be extremely difficult to remove. Invasive species grow aggressively, often forming dense stands that crowd out native vegetation, reduce biodiversity, and alter the structure and function of the ecosystem. They provide little to no value for local wildlife, disrupting food chains and leading to the decline of native species that are unable to compete.

In addition to plants, invasive animals—such as certain species of insects, fish, and amphibians—could also colonize the exposed areas, further destabilizing the ecosystem. These species can have devastating effects on native populations, spreading diseases, preying on local wildlife, and outcompeting native species for food and habitat.

The spread of invasive species is often exacerbated by human activities. For instance, hikers, bikers, and even pets can inadvertently carry seeds or spores of invasive plants into the area, where they take root and spread. Similarly, human-introduced materials like soil, mulch, or even construction debris can contain invasive seeds or organisms, leading to their establishment in new areas.

The Importance of Thoughtful Stewardship

Preventing human encroachment and the spread of invasive species requires a proactive approach to land management. As the community considers the future of Mill Pond and Stump Pond, it’s essential to recognize the risks associated with leaving these areas unmanaged and unprotected. This is not just about preserving the natural beauty of the parks; it’s about ensuring that the land remains a safe and healthy environment for both people and wildlife.

One way to mitigate these risks is through careful planning and the implementation of protective measures that limit human access to sensitive areas. For example, temporary fencing could be used to keep people out of the most vulnerable parts of the exposed lakebeds, giving native plants a chance to establish themselves and reducing the likelihood of invasive species taking hold. Educational signage could also be installed to inform visitors about the importance of protecting these areas and the dangers of introducing non-native species.

Another important strategy is to actively manage the land through restoration and rewilding efforts. By replanting native vegetation, stabilizing the soil, and monitoring for invasive species, the community can help guide the natural recovery of the ecosystem and reduce the risk of further degradation. This approach would not only protect the environment but also create a more resilient landscape that can better withstand future challenges, such as climate change and extreme weather events.

Balancing Human Use with Environmental Protection

While the risks of human encroachment and invasive species are real and significant, it’s also important to recognize that these parks are valuable community resources meant to be enjoyed by people. The challenge, then, is to find a balance between human use and environmental protection—one that allows visitors to experience the beauty and tranquility of Mill Pond and Stump Pond without causing harm to the fragile ecosystems that are struggling to recover.

One potential solution is to designate specific areas of the parks for different uses, creating zones that prioritize either human recreation or ecological restoration. For example, certain parts of the exposed lakebeds could be set aside for rewilding efforts, with limited access to ensure that the environment can recover naturally. Meanwhile, other areas could be developed into low-impact recreational spaces, such as walking trails or observation platforms, that allow visitors to enjoy the parks without disturbing the recovering landscape.

By carefully managing the newly available land, the community can create a landscape that serves both human and ecological needs—a place where people can connect with nature, learn about the importance of conservation, and help protect the environment for future generations.

A Call to Protect & Preserve

The failure of the dams at Mill Pond and Stump Pond has created a rare opportunity to rethink how we interact with and manage these natural spaces. However, this opportunity also comes with significant risks. If not carefully managed, the newly exposed land could fall victim to human encroachment, invasive species, and other forms of environmental degradation, leading to the permanent loss of these cherished landscapes.

As the community debates the future of these parks, it’s crucial to prioritize thoughtful stewardship and proactive land management. By taking steps to protect the environment, manage invasive species, and balance human use with ecological health, we can ensure that Mill Pond and Stump Pond remain valuable resources for both people and wildlife—places where the natural beauty of Long Island can be preserved and enjoyed for generations to come.

In the final section of this article, we will explore how sustainable practices like permaculture could help bridge the gap between restoration and rewilding, creating a landscape that is both ecologically sound and welcoming to visitors. By embracing these practices, we can create a future for Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park that honors the past while looking forward to a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with nature.

Permaculture & Rewilding – A Harmonious Solution

As the community grapples with the decision of whether to restore or rewild the Mill Pond at Avalon Preserve and Stump Pond at Blydenburgh Park, a third option emerges—one that seeks to harmonize the goals of both restoration and rewilding while ensuring the long-term health of the environment and the enjoyment of the parks by the public. This option is rooted in the principles of permaculture, a sustainable approach to land management that mimics the patterns and processes of natural ecosystems. By integrating permaculture with rewilding efforts, we can create a landscape that not only honors the historical significance of these parks but also fosters a resilient and thriving ecosystem that is better suited to the challenges of the future.

Understanding Permaculture: A Sustainable Approach to Land Management

Permaculture is a design philosophy that focuses on creating self-sustaining systems that work in harmony with nature. Rather than imposing human will on the land, permaculture seeks to understand and replicate the natural processes that allow ecosystems to thrive. This approach emphasizes the use of native plants, the conservation of water and soil, and the creation of diverse habitats that support a wide range of species. By following these principles, permaculture aims to create landscapes that are not only productive and beautiful but also resilient and regenerative.

In the context of Mill Pond and Stump Pond, permaculture offers a way to manage the land that balances the needs of people and the environment. By carefully planning the restoration and rewilding of these areas, we can create a landscape that supports native wildlife, enhances biodiversity, and provides opportunities for community engagement and education.

Permaculture & Rewilding: A Symbiotic Relationship

While rewilding and permaculture are distinct concepts, they share many common goals and can be effectively combined to create a harmonious solution for Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park. Rewilding focuses on allowing nature to take its course, restoring ecosystems to their natural state by removing human interference and allowing natural processes to reestablish themselves. Permaculture, on the other hand, involves more intentional design and management, using human ingenuity to enhance and support natural systems.

By integrating these approaches, we can create a landscape that is both wild and managed, offering the best of both worlds. For example, rewilding efforts could focus on restoring native plant communities and reestablishing natural water flows, while permaculture techniques could be used to create food forests, pollinator gardens, and other productive landscapes that provide habitat for wildlife while also benefiting the community.

Restoring Native Habitats: One of the key principles of permaculture is the use of native plants that are well adapted to the local environment. By reintroducing native species to the exposed lakebeds and surrounding areas, we can help restore the natural habitats that have been lost over time. These plants will not only provide food and shelter for wildlife but also help stabilize the soil, prevent erosion, and improve water quality.

For example, the reintroduction of native wetland plants such as cattails, bulrushes, and sedges could help reestablish the natural filtration processes that were lost when the ponds drained. These plants are excellent at absorbing excess nutrients and pollutants, improving water quality and creating a healthier environment for aquatic life. At the same time, they provide valuable habitat for birds, amphibians, and other wildlife that rely on wetland ecosystems.

Water Management and Soil Conservation: Permaculture also emphasizes the importance of water management and soil conservation—two critical issues in the aftermath of the dam failures. By designing the landscape to capture, store, and use water efficiently, we can reduce the risk of flooding and drought while ensuring that the land remains fertile and productive.

One approach could be the creation of swales—shallow ditches designed to capture and slow down the flow of water across the landscape. Swales can help prevent erosion, recharge groundwater, and create microhabitats that support a diverse range of plant and animal species. In areas where the soil has been disturbed by the draining of the ponds, swales could be used to stabilize the land and encourage the growth of native vegetation.

Creating Productive Landscapes: Permaculture is not just about restoring natural habitats—it’s also about creating landscapes that are productive and beneficial to people. By incorporating elements such as food forests, edible gardens, and medicinal plantings into the parks, we can create spaces that provide resources for the community while also supporting wildlife.

A food forest, for example, is a diverse planting of trees, shrubs, herbs, and groundcovers that mimics the structure of a natural forest. In a permaculture design, food forests are created to provide a wide range of products, such as fruits, nuts, herbs, and medicinal plants, all while enhancing the local ecosystem. By planting a food forest in the parks, we can create a space that is both beautiful and functional, offering visitors a chance to learn about sustainable agriculture while enjoying the natural beauty of the landscape.

Community Involvement and Education: One of the most powerful aspects of permaculture is its emphasis on community involvement and education. By engaging the community in the restoration and rewilding process, we can create a sense of ownership and responsibility for the parks, ensuring that they are cared for and protected for generations to come.

Workshops, volunteer planting days, and educational programs can all play a role in bringing the community together to learn about and participate in the permaculture and rewilding efforts. By teaching people about the importance of native plants, sustainable water management, and the benefits of permaculture, we can foster a deeper connection to the land and inspire a new generation of environmental stewards.

Avalon Preserve & Blydenburgh Park Reimagined

By combining the principles of permaculture with the goals of rewilding, we can create a future for Mill Pond and Stump Pond that honors both the history of these parks and the natural processes that sustain life. This approach offers a way to restore the ecological health of the landscape while also providing spaces for human enjoyment and education.

Imagine a landscape where native plants thrive, supporting a diverse range of wildlife and creating a vibrant, self-sustaining ecosystem. Imagine a park where visitors can stroll through a food forest, learn about medicinal herbs, or watch birds and butterflies in a pollinator garden. Imagine a place where the history of the ponds is preserved through interpretive signs and educational programs, while the land itself is allowed to regenerate and evolve naturally.

This is the vision that permaculture and rewilding offer—a vision of a landscape that is resilient, sustainable, and beautiful, where people and nature coexist in harmony. It’s a vision that requires careful planning, thoughtful design, and the active participation of the community, but it’s a vision that can be achieved.

Bridging the Gap: Moving Forward Together

As the debate over the future of Mill Pond and Stump Pond continues, it’s clear that there is no one-size-fits-all solution. The decision to restore or rewild these areas is a complex one, involving a range of factors from historical significance to environmental health. But by embracing the principles of permaculture and rewilding, we can find a path forward that honors the past while creating a sustainable future.

Permaculture offers a way to balance the needs of people and the environment, creating landscapes that are both productive and resilient. Rewilding allows us to restore natural processes and create spaces where nature can thrive. Together, these approaches offer a harmonious solution—one that can help ensure that Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park remain cherished spaces for generations to come.

As we move forward, it’s essential to keep the conversation going, to engage the community in the decision-making process, and to work together to create a future for these parks that is both sustainable and inclusive. By doing so, we can ensure that the legacy of Mill Pond and Stump Pond is not just preserved, but reimagined in a way that reflects our commitment to the environment and to future generations.

In the final section, we will bring together the key points of this article, offering a vision for the future that respects the history of these parks while embracing the opportunities that lie ahead. Whether we choose restoration, rewilding, or a combination of both, the goal is to create a landscape that is resilient, beautiful, and in harmony with the natural world.

Shaping the Legacy of Our Parks

The future of Mill Pond at Avalon Preserve and Stump Pond at Blydenburgh Park represents more than just a decision about land and water; it’s a reflection of our collective values and our relationship with the natural world. These ponds, long cherished for their beauty, historical significance, and recreational value, now stand at a crossroads. The storm that drained them has left us with a choice: to rebuild what was lost, to embrace the wildness that nature offers, or to seek a path that marries the best of both worlds.

Restoration, with its promise of preserving history and maintaining the familiar landscapes we hold dear, carries the weight of nostalgia and continuity. It speaks to our desire to maintain a connection to the past, to honor the ingenuity of those who came before us, and to ensure that these beloved spaces continue to serve the community in the way they always have. Yet, restoration is not without its challenges—technical, financial, and environmental. The task of rebuilding is complex and fraught with uncertainty, particularly in an age of climate change, where the next “thousand-year storm” could be just around the corner.

On the other hand, rewilding offers a chance to restore the natural processes that have been disrupted by human intervention. It invites us to step back, to allow nature to heal and regenerate, and to create a landscape that is resilient, sustainable, and rich in biodiversity. Rewilding challenges us to rethink our relationship with the land, to consider not just what we want from these spaces, but what the land itself needs to thrive. Yet, this approach too has its risks, including the loss of cherished cultural landmarks and the potential for unintended ecological consequences.

But there is a way forward that embraces the strengths of both approaches—a way that honors the history of these parks while also looking to the future with a spirit of innovation and sustainability. By integrating the principles of permaculture with rewilding, we can create a landscape that is both resilient and welcoming, a place where nature and human activity exist in harmony. This approach allows us to restore what was lost, not by replicating the past, but by creating something new and enduring—spaces that provide habitat for wildlife, opportunities for recreation, and a living classroom for future generations.

The choice we make now will shape the legacy of Avalon Preserve and Blydenburgh Park for years to come. It is a choice that requires thoughtful deliberation, community engagement, and a deep respect for both our natural environment and our shared history. As we stand at this crossroads, let us not simply rebuild or retreat, but reimagine these parks as places where the past and the future meet—a vision of a landscape that is beautiful, sustainable, and in tune with the rhythms of nature.

Let us move forward together, not just to restore what was lost, but to create something even greater—a place where history and nature coexist, where the lessons of the past guide our steps into the future, and where the beauty of Long Island’s natural world is preserved and celebrated for generations to come.

---

 

Author: Michael A. Evans

.Michael A Evans is a passionate advocate for preserving and reviving ancestral knowledge through modern applications. As the founder of Forgotten Skillz, he is dedicated to teaching the skills of self-sufficiency, bushcraft, and sustainable living, drawing inspiration from historical practices to empower individuals in today’s world. Michael’s work extends beyond survival skills; he also leads Vision Martial Arts in Patchogue, NY, where he guides both adults and children in realizing their potential through martial arts. Additionally, Michael contributes to the educational field as a collaborator on the “Little Laurie Science Stories” book series and the Ninja Née Science Education Program. With a background in therapeutic massage from the NY College of Health Professions, Michael continues to provide holistic care as the lead therapist at Massage LI.